Nope. Mars Balancing Stones is sol 464. Doney's image is sol 513
Doney, can you please post the whole image and outline the whereabouts of anomalies. Thanks
-- Edited by Humanoid on Saturday 3rd of April 2010 11:30:31 PM
I was going to let this slide but i want to come back on this. I mentioned in my post that the rock was shot at a different angle. You stated you didnt recognize it due to the different angle?
You based your reply on SOL numbers?? You didnt even check to see what I was talking about? Chandre took it upon herself to just see what im talking about.
Sorry I was no where near a computer to punch up the image but im sure you must remember it as you corrected my name of the thread.
Just found you reply a little strange..NOPE?
Sorry humanoid but just bothered me a lot. But im sure you just had an off day. Thanks for looking in anyways.
I'll just say for the record... this site aint flat. Its 3D. The tampering has (Amazingly) taken out the structures that are 3d. Chandre.. your 1st Avatar (i think) was an example of the 3d objects tampered out.. They just didnt complete the job on that area.
Top section of Lions head missing.
I remember reading Harrys post .. It cryptically points to Every line and crack has a purpose. Not natural.
Thanks guys.. i knew it just had no computer to hand.. There is a level of tampering thst goes way beyond what is currently known.. harry touched on it but it was too far fetched to understand at the time. Every thing is moving.. Slowly.. and catalog numbers are not to be relied upon. If theyre tampering with images then theyre tampering with registrations of images. This is a very serious problem. there is no way anyone should trust the sol numbers , their order, time date ref etc..
Now the mystery is why the hell did they change the sequence or that little old robot has been going nowhere and there is a 3rd robot out there.
I have seen other sequences of these locations and the ground is moving. I just cant relocate the images. Dam!!
Cheers Chandre and also Humanoid. Humanoid believe it or not your cold unbiased view, though frank, helps push those and challenge what we see. great work guys.. Really frustrated, need to get back to my machine ASAP..
Chandre, yes I can now say with confidence it is indeed the same stone. Positions of surrounding rocks check out perfectly, even though viewed from different angles. Guess what misled me before was the stone's visual appearance resulting from the viewing angles from different sols.
Humanoid, I understand what you are saying but if you compare the two images you have to agree that they are of the same area. If not, the mystery deepens as that would mean that there are two almost identical sites within 25 metres of each other and if that is true than this is a discovery of ENORMOUS significance.....
This photograph 2P167556899EFFA9HEP2280L5M1 is version 1 of a photograph produced for M - MIPL (OPGS) at JPL on Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:33 (Sol 443). It was taken with the PANCAM, through the Left camera, using a 535nm (20nm bandpass) (green) filter on the Mars Rover Spirit.
It is a full frame EDR picture which is raw, is NOT liniarised, and is NOT thumbnail sized
The picture was taken at site number A9 on drive number HE, and the command sequence number P2280 to take the picture was instructed by PMA & Remote Sensing instr. (Pancam, Navcam, Hazcam, MI, Mini-TES) and belongs to the group 2000 through 2899 - Pancam sequences
Your picture is Sol 513 or 514 so it appears that it is the same site taken from the other side. The site ringed with a question mark in the official map....
-- Edited by Chandre on Sunday 4th of April 2010 02:03:30 PM
Chandre, the stone seen in doney's image from sol 513 is the one below from sol 514 where it can be observed up close. That stone is completely different to the one from sol 464 (Balancing Stones thread)
The first image is Mars Balancing Stones from a different angle so the second image is to the right of that.
Humanoid, guess they must have come back for a second look later.... I have a series of the Balancing Stones taken on Sol 514 which shows this angle.
I am working on this at the moment, in the meantime I will leave you with a Spirit Traverse map downloaded from the official web-site.
Two interesting things here, the aereal view is blurred unlike the other maps and two areas are circled with a question mark (by them not me). Strangely the one is our Balancing Stones area (as far as I can tell) and the other is another area I am looking at... I am not ready to post yet so I will leave the map as a teaser
-- Edited by Chandre on Sunday 4th of April 2010 06:23:04 AM
I'm posting two photos with different perspectives. These are some of the best examples of tampering. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911803EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911839EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG
Sorry Done.. Great find.. This an image where I started to believe in aliens..
Im not using superior software.. Just an amazing friend and colleague whose knowledge of tampering and image structure is next to none. ( im using photoshop)..
Have fun.. Look around central stones (main full image) and look for thread called standing stones.
Hi doney... had a look.. I think i'll leave it to others as this has a more interesting story for me .
Chandre, Humanoid and Xenon... When you get a chance have a look at the link supplied Above.. (i'll put it below too) http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911803EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG
Lucky I have a photographic memory... I think.. ok, I know for sure this is the same location that you guys and Harry had ur meeting of the minds (shall we say). Just shot at a different angle... I think i can pull up the glyphs or their location..
Doney you stumbled on very important ground. This is one of the locations where I first found Harrys work.. I wont put the link to thread I'll leave that to admins , if they want too.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911803EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG I also noticed the diamond pattern to the right of, what appears to be, the "15". I noticed some of you have superior software that can extract more detail. Please give this a shot.