http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/44/6621.jpg Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad Mission: 11 Magazine: 44 Magazine Letter: V Latitude / Longitude: 1.5° N / 105° E Description: ASCENT STAGE LUNAR MODULE; LIMB Film Type: 368 Film Width: 70 mm Film Color: color
Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad Mission: 11 Magazine: 44 Magazine Letter: V Latitude / Longitude: 6 ° N / 121 ° E Film Type: 368 Film Width: 70 mm Film Color: color Feature (s): KING AREA
zooming in the center of the crater that appears in the foreground and lowering the brightness, contrast up a bit and adjusting the midtones .... we have this
We are led to believe there is no other species resident on the moon.
If that is the case, the features showing in the image below should not be seen.
Please accept my apologies for the quality of this image. When one considers that the scene was captured using a professional Hasselblad camera either the original was under-exposed or the image was 'doctored' prior to release into the public domain.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Fascinating stuff. It was what I had hoped for when I joined the site. So many of the other related sites consist of who saw what lights in the sky at night! Plus finding a scratch on their arm which they couldn't remember doing was adequate proof they had been 'abducted' and experimented on! By ET.
I saw some photo's recently of a derelict space craft on the other side of the lunar surface. It had numerous hyroglyphics on the side and was huge. Add to that the various and numerous conversations recorded by NASA of Armstrong, Aldrin etc; plus Aldrins now famous statement that "we were warned not to return to the moon" and "we are being watched from the rim of the crater"
I dont believe we have to travel to the far reaches of space to find ET. I firmly believe ET is a hell of a lot closer than most of us think. I'm trying to remember where I saw those photo's!
James, posting pictures without any explanation does not really contribute anything to the thread, we need your opinion or for you to tell us what these images are illustrating or why you posted them, etc. That is why we all join this forum - to read the interesting posts and to post our own unusual images that we have found plus our comments on them. Oh... and we also like links to the original image or article if these are available please.
-- Edited by qmantoo on Monday 6th of June 2011 01:41:43 AM
Anyone care to put this into a summary for us? Google translator is good, but sometimes it loses the meaning of the passage. I think this is interesting, and I would like to know more. Maybe the western news agencies will pick it up?
Siberian astrophysics have seen on the Moon a mysterious beam.
Novosibirsk, 14 deck - RIA Novosti news agency, Maria Kormiltseva. Novosibirsk astrophysics on the night of December, 14th, spending optical supervision of the Moon in a maximum of flight of a meteoric stream of Geminidy, have fixed on video a mysterious beam on its surface, has informed RIA Novosti news agency managing the educational automated astronomical complex of Novosibirsk state university Alfija Nesterenko. Scientists conducted a digital video shooting of a dark part of the companion of the Earth to fix the flashes caused by falling of meteorites. "We have made out in a gray foggy video stream the certain beam a little disseminated, but distinguishable. Spatially it dissected the Moon surface at an angle 45 degrees to терминатору is a line has undressed the shined and dark part of the Moon. After supervision we will try to make out files in more details", - the interlocutor has told. Нестеренко supposes that the seen can be a certain optical effect. "Though in case of malfunctions of optics or a matrix this effect would be present at the chamber constantly. And we observed this beam from time to time. I and Olja Kozyrenko, our assistant, student СГГА. Men abstained from comments", - she has told. The interlocutor has informed that in researches which will proceed on the night of December, 15th and 16, the known Russian astronomer and astrophotographer Alexander Juferev will take part. "Supervision of meteoric streams in the conditions of the Siberian winter - has put however uncommon, so and хлопотное. Especially, it is necessary if to observe even not stream, and the response of this stream to Moon surfaces. The wire from the chamber has successfully taken place in a crack of a plastic window, the telescope was above a panel observatory. We within several hours in the dark" hypnotized "a video stream from the semi-moon to notice though not clearest вспышечку, but the nature doesn't open the secrets easily", - Nesterenko has told. Besides, as she said, the image still is necessary отконтрастировать, and atmosphere that night "smoked" a little, though with weather has carried - it was clear. "Supervision will proceed. We all the same very much hope to see at least one bright flash", - hasn'ted Nesterenko. In first half of December one of the most active annually operating meteoric streams of Geminidy is observed. http://www.rian.ru/science/20101214/308540972.html
The view shown below is of the terrain just above where the hydro anomaly was found.
From further analysis I am convinced the black areas showing in the image is water.
I have saturated the image somewhat to bring out differences in the texture but the amazing thing is that large areas of green are showing and no adjustments have been made to the RGB settings.
In the second image I have circled some of the many anomalies. The arrows point to the major features of interest.
Take note of what appears to be craters are not craters at all. The features would appear to be built constructions. When considering that Copernicus is 93km in diameter, the size of these crater-like features have to be very large indeed, but who could have built them?
In order to have a better view of the detail, you may find it better to download the images so that you can zoom in closer to the features.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
The images supplied by John Lear have many different areas which are blacked out and darkened and you can often see the machines and buildings in between and underneath these areas.
I though I read that there was only one area which had been tampered with in this series of photographs, but from my investigations, this is not quite correct. I see many areas of tampering.
I have started another thread about atmosphere on the Moon as I think this is a good subject for discussion and could take us in all kinds of different directions. People may want to refer to it in later times, so it is best in a subject of its own.
Frutty, maybe we should call it "Copernicus Rushmore".
I believe the intelligent species responsible for what we are seeing beat us to the moon by thousands of years. They probably came from Mars due to some catastrophe that was due to take place. The Moon and this planet was their nearest neighbour so it was a 'do or die' situation.
The majority of structures seen in the lunar images are very well camouflaged. Even the hydro facility appears to have a covering to make it blend in well with the landscape, but the distribution network would have to be in the open due to the dangers involved. The finding of this facility tells us that the inhabitants have advanced technology.
So, considering this and the probability that there is also a large resident population, what are they breathing to sustain life?
Frutty, at this point would you like to introduce us to the anomalies you have explored in the center of the crater.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
I was just reminding folk that the subject of the thread is related to lunar life evidence and drifting off into a discussion on fractals would not really be relevant to what we are discussing here.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Timewarp, point noted my apologies. I have copied the last bit of the fractal discussion to a new page ' Are Moon images fractally generated ?'.
Please continue any discussions on the subject there so that this thread is not disrupted. I have not deleted from this thread as it has become part of the thread so once again, sorry for that !
The idea of fractally-generated imaging is an interesting phenomenon but I do not wish to deviate into another topic as this thread is about the discussion of evidence relating to lunar life.
I take onboard what you are projecting in relation to the image but we have to remember the original was produced on analogue media, namely film, which has been converted to digital form.
I do not see any fractals in the image in question, but I will say that I may possibly be missing something that can be seen by others. What I do see are some examples of an art-form that can also be observed on Mars and some of the early neolithic monuments on this planet.
The give-away that the shapes are anthropological, i.e., heads and faces, is the inclusion of a cranial protrusion. This is a very important feature when searching for evidence of life. Artistic productions by modern painters and sculpturers on Earth do not display this particular feature in their work. Therefore, what we are viewing on the moon has to have been produced by an alien intelligence.
Shown below is a copy of the 'carvings' image shown above. I have circled many of the shapes which I believe have not been produced by natural formation.
Please note the shapes I have arrowed. You may find that two shapes appear as part of the same work or, one shape may appear as being as behind another shape.
Frutty has made reference to the rocky formation in the center of the crater. I would like to include and discuss the anomalies that can be observed on these formations later.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Frutty, I have now done some homework and hope that I have a grasp of the basics of a fractaly produced image and I can see your point. They are very realistic and show many features we are seeing repeated on asteroids and on Mars in the images that are released.
I just have a thought, we know that the craters exist on the Moon as we can see them with the naked eye and telescopes from Earth, so all they could really do is overlay a fractally produced 'window' to hide what lies beneath. A 'truths protective layer' so to speak This would produce the geometric lines and curves that you are highlighting over the orofinal surface features, perhaps even following them to a degree. The best way to hide something is in the open, so just changing and distorting what is really there should be enough and covering your a** in case it all comes out one day and you can say, ohhhh that was a computer glitch that produced fractals that distorted the image...beyond our control...ghost in the machine...blah de blah
Now lets say that they did the same thing with Mars, perhaps taking aereal images from height and then fractally producing what they are releasing as surface images. The anomalies that exist may actually still show through then if they are using the original data and it means Iceman and you were both correct in what you were saying.
Am I on the right path in understanding how this could be applied (in my very basic English) or completely off the path ?
Until now, we have not debated the sphynx in the middle of the "crater", which we know is an entire city, as demonstrated by the imagery produced in this thread.
Here is the face of the pharoah in the heaf sphynx.
this is the page the “picture of the year” allegedly depicting crater Copernicus was published on, in “popular mechanics” (as well in LIFE Magazine). on Oct 1969.
However TIME magazine had already published an article about it, talking about the “black sky”, that thanks to our current processing capabilities, we have been able to demonstrate was artificially blacked out, on Friday Dec 09 1966.