Alien Anomalies

qmantoo, as you have shown an interest in the original image I posted, I have done some further work on it in an effort to highlight the structures in the valley.

You are correct in saying the images that we have to deal with in GE are not very good but they are the best we have available at present.

Shown below is the full image with a selected area for investigation. This is followed by a close up view in color and a grayscale image. I have included arrows that point to some of the more prominent structures.

MylesO wrote:

---

There is a lot in that photograph I see.

I did some layering and came up with the below.

---

Timewarp wrote:

---

 

thewatcher, I do not believe the structures seen in the images are ruins.

What is showing in the images is what I would expect to see if the descendants of beings from our sister planet were resident on this planet.

As I have explained before, their art and the way they realize their art-forms is the key. To find the answer to where people from Mars have set down roots and existed - follow their art.

In the near future, I would hope a scientific expedition is launched to explore this particular area in more depth.

 

---

I under stand Timewarp . Im refering to my earlier inages foind in your larger submission.

The image above has  right angled walls.  Pipes??n etc.  Now there are other structures in ur images that are difficult to work out but im cautiious of pixilation on high contrast, Ice etc but theres something there. I cant conclude due to the very poor quality of the images so Ive based my thoughts on larger clearer structures.  So im not disagreeing with u but much clearer larger imaages of anomalies are needed for the public to get an idea of what we are looking at..

There are ruins in Antartica and there have been many many expeditions.. list below..

http://www.lonelyplanet.com/antarctica/history

The Portuguese made the first important penetrations south, beginning with a naval voyage in 1487–88 led by Bartholomeu Días de Novaes and João Infante, who sailed around the southern tip of Africa, Cape Agulhas, as far as present-day Mozambique. Their voyage opened the way for another naval expedition, led by Vasco da Gama in 1497, to discover the way around Africa to India. These expeditions proved that if there was a great southern continent, it was not attached to Africa.

Likewise, Portuguese explorer Fernão de Magalhães (Ferdinand Magellan), leading the first circumnavigation of the globe from 1519 to 1522, discovered and named Tierra del Fuego (‘Land of Fire, ’ named not for the ancients’ torrid regions, but for the campfires built by the native Yámana people that had been spotted onshore). By sailing through the straits that now bear his name, Magellan proved the southern land was not connected to South America, either, although it remained possible that it was attached to Tierra del Fuego.

What’s remarkable about these discoveries is that their makers were disproving rather than proving the existence of a great southern land. Antarctica was a mysterious place whose extent was originally imagined to be enormous: it was thought to cover the whole Southern Ocean and connect to the southern extremes of the known continents. Although each subsequent voyage of discovery pared off great sections of open ocean where Antarctica was obviously not located, few people seemed able to conceive that the continent might not exist at all; instead the belief persisted strongly that Antarctica – a greatly diminished Antarctica, to be sure – must lie just a little further south. But the Southern Ocean’s terrifying storms and impenetrable pack ice conspired to keep the continent’s white face shrouded from inquiring eyes for centuries more.

Terra Australis (Southern Land) – the term was first used by Flemish mapmaker Oronce Finé in 1531 – continued to exert its attraction, however. Englishman Francis Drake, sailing in Pelican (later named Golden Hind), made the second circumnavigation of the globe from 1577–80. Drake discovered the passage now named for him, definitively proving that no southern continent was connected to either South America or Tierra del Fuego. As the sub-Antarctic and Southern Ocean archipelagoes (the Falklands, South Sandwich Islands, South Georgia, Bouvetøya, Îles Kerguelen) were found in succession, some were initially thought to be northerly projections of Terra Australis, but each eventually proved merely insular. Dutchman Abel Janszoon Tasman’s voyages, charting parts of Tasmania and New Zealand in 1623–25 and again in 1644, also sparked hope that they might be part of the great missing continent, but they were not.

^ Back to top

Cook

Yorkshireman James Cook (1728–79), once apprenticed to a shopkeeper, was the widest-ranging explorer who ever lived. He circumnavigated the globe three times, discovering more territory than anyone else in history. Aged 40, he undertook the first of his three great voyages. Between 1768 and 1771, he found New Zealand and the whole east coast of Australia, claiming them for Britain. On his third voyage, from 1776 to 1779, he explored the Arctic coasts of North America and Siberia before being killed by natives in Hawaii in 1779.

Cook’s Antarctic discoveries came on his second voyage, beginning in 1772 aboard HMS Resolution and HMS Adventure. Like HMS Endeavour, Cook’s previous ship, these vessels were colliers from the north country of England. Part of Cook’s genius lay in persuading the Royal Navy of the value of these ships that he had come to know in his earliest seagoing days as a deckhand on the coal run from Yorkshire to London: he knew that these shallow-drafted barques could explore close inshore without risk of running aground. On his second voyage with the ships, Cook’s expedition sailed 109, 500km and penetrated further south than anyone before. They crossed the Antarctic Circle on January 17, 1773, becoming the first people to do so, and crossed it twice again without ever sighting land, despite pushing to a record 71°10´S. On their third pass through the pack ice, Cook and his men landed on South Georgia, which he called the Isle of Georgia, and discovered the South Sandwich Islands.

Despite his remarkable first circumnavigation of Antarctica – done without losing a single crewmember – Cook failed to find the southern continent itself. It’s almost more remarkable that he didn’t find Antarctica, given that he managed to get so much further south than anyone before. Cook simply had poor luck: in the longitudes where he managed to penetrate furthest south, the coast of Antarctica itself also swerved southward. Upon leaving the frozen southern seas for the last time, Cook wrote:

Thick fogs, Snow storms, Intense Cold and every other thing that can render Navigation dangerous, one has to encounter and these difficulties are greatly heightned by the enexpressable horrid aspect of the Country, a Country doomed by Nature never once to feel the warmth of the Suns rays, but to lie for ever buried under everlasting snow and ice.

If there were any remaining doubt how Cook felt about the prospects of a still-undiscovered Antarctica, he later underscored this opinion:

...whoever has resolution and perseverance to clear up this point by proceeding farther than I have done, I shall not envy him the honour of discovery, but I will be bold to say that the world will not be benefited by it.

So convincing were his pessimistic sentiments that Cook discouraged other explorers from seeking the great southern continent for decades afterward. But he also recorded his observations of large numbers of seals and whales – and others, more commercially minded than the Royal Navy, took notice.

TenderHero wrote:

---

Look were you people are up against!
One picture of interest (I copied it before it was gone) and "they" who makes us happy with panted picuters from Antartica, have removed it in no time.

---

One single drop wrote:

---

Something new ?

---

Just an area I havent spent much time on due to my skeptism. Not come across any strong structural anomalies in the Arctic. Till NOw! This could be nothing but its leaning to someting (in my mind). Skippers work (though good) didnt hack it for me. there were anomaies but nothing as big and as detailed as what MylesO has submitted. My Backed up with Lunar and Martian anomalies now the artic lol just a little too much.

Great stuf

TW

gbull wrote:

---

the first pic is great TW as is the rest posted.

the thing that gets me is that the pics might as well be of mars.


given the chance any of us gets to see the areas ourselves are about even!


the structure looking things look like some on mars and the moon.

if they were confirmed structures and not natural formations then that would be a blow to the

"trick of light and shadow, etc" people.

---