Alien Anomalies

Sorry about that, It was the third of three from your previous post, rotated counterclockwise............"There are other funny things in this photo that look like long dead animals, nothing recognisable by earthly standards of course.  A strange looking "rock" with a square door on it stands above a grotesque skull in the last pic."

-- Edited by Macten on Wednesday 20th of March 2013 04:41:01 AM

Attachments

View image View image View image

I think this one might be one of my favourite ones yet.  To me it almost looks as if someone was tryin' to get out of an crashed escape pod, or possibly a sarcophagus that has broken open. Ony highlighted the "arm" to keep it simple.

Hi Macten would there happen to be pictures that also may show a bit more of the surrounding area?

Thanks, Phil

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The way the projections are at the same angles relative to the ground is reminicent of a spinal column.  I also think it looks like bones. There are other funny things in this photo that look like long dead animals, nothing recognisable by earthly standards of course.  A strange looking "rock" with a square door on it stands above a grotesque skull in the last pic.

Good find

-- Edited by Macten on Wednesday 20th of March 2013 04:41:01 AM

Attachments

View image View image View image

__________________

Warning: Opinion oriented reply.

Agreed, me too, but some in this forum believe we should be more "scientific" in our approach. I have had lengthy conversations with those who dont believe that I am qualified enough to even offer an opinion. Well I say to them, so what? I will offer my opinion whether they like it or not.  No one has to agree, and that is the point. If you do not like my assesment of the evidence then it is your right to dispute it and counter, But, I still dont have to agree.

THe original question has not been answered. Is there any way to tell what size "bones" or any other object in a picture is? Is there a formula you can use by resolution or photo size?

OK, you got me.  I'm not a biologist in any way, shape or form.  I'm just a simple guy with reasonable intelligence and these appear to be bones to me and a lot of others.

Maybe it's just wishful thinking...

quil207, I would be interested to know what makes you think the highlighted objects are 'bones'.

Yes, here is the link.  I mistakenly named this as being SOL129, it's actually SOL29.

http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/029/2P128948573EFF0327P2380L7M1.HTML

Hey Morbius, what are you talking about?  And guil207 do you have a link to this photo?

Here is one I forgot about, interesting bunch of things.

Edited by Chandre to insert images

quil207, hello again, have discounted the next 8 pics, but the last, 10th, deserves some comment, as it is a direct continuation of the 1st pic, examined earlier. The attached then, are a follow-up and, being annotate, should be fairly self-explanatory. Interestingly, Marsrocks has also noted, and commented on, this very same anomaly found in this peculiar but instructive pic. regards   

Edited by Chandre to insert images

Unfortunately not saying very much about the anomalies and the so called 'GOLD Standard' is a little off target! 
How about.....  Learning to understand Mars geology standard!
Topographical studies plus a deep understanding  remote data would be ur 1st class.
No need running when one can barely walk ;)
TW

Here you go quil207, am attaching a 3 set reply to your 1st of 10 pictures which, as I said ' would be happy to take a look at.' Will be examining the others and post them one at a time,  if you don't mind. They are indeed some nice choices. The attached are annotated and should be of some help in gaining an initial respect and understanding of problematic areas of anomaly identification.  regards                    -Morbius

Edited by Chandre to insert images

http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/599/2N179546209EFFAEGHP0775L0M1.JPG  One sol before.  There are strange things laying all over the place.

Close ups of your first link or the third pic down below> http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/600/2N179636254EFFAEGHP0615R0M1.HTML

Hey Guil those are some fascinating photos.  The first two I don't think I've seen before but 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, we have talked about quite a bit.  There is a report on Skippers site about the eel looking thing and the square hole in the rock. Hopefully he can get that back up and running pretty soon.  There is a thread somewhere on here entitled square holes in rocks.  It might be on there I'm not sure.  Do you have any links for the first two or the last three?  I would love to look at them a little more. 

Sure, I hope you like these.

Hello Morbius, well I see what appears to me to be pieces of some unknown machine.  What I believe to be manufactured pieces of a native made machine.  This pic was taken by the Spirit rover, raw images, on SOL 541 on this link.

http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit.html

Hello guil207, and thanks for the reply. Just where did you get the pic? And, as important, what do you see in it ?             -Morbius

Yes Chandre , and you have been instrumental in my gaining of that essential quality of understanding . So , will continue to follow and promote what I can now consider reasonable and fair guidelines . It is really I then , who should be thanking you , and so I do ..much appreciated.  -Morbius

That is not simple TW! I percieve however , there is much to be gleaned from your critique , and will pursue this in further detail. I wish you would not speak to people , like down-to , but with people , eye to eye , face to face , heart to heart. This is respectful ,  and you know what TW , it easily overcomes obstacles ... and gains respect too! I do not say this lightly .  When viewing Chandre's directive , I sat looking at the screen for 20 minutes. My mind was in hyperdrive juggling things around , a controversy raged as to who I thought I was ... and who I should be. In the end , when the smoke cleared away , I was left with the inescapable conclusion that Chandre was correct ,  and posted a reply to abide by such advice . I think I have lived up to this commitment , and will continue to do so . It was then , not without a struggle to decide , and yet have always felt the better for it .. there's always room for improvement I guess . I am hoping all will take this to heart .. it is important .

Perhaps I should have named it Hippo Hotel , Hyena Hideout .. anything but Sue! I think I'm gonna put up a suprise Post for you TW .. wouldn't that be something?!!/ Cheers        -Morbius

TW. What is the descriptive difference in " the debate on structural descriptions that point to function -instead of form?"  As ' geo-structures ' are a natural-structure , -an Ayer's Rock or Boulder by definition , is this the 'form' that is disqualified? Or is the ' function ' of import because it was referred to as an Administration Building? Or is there something else here that perhaps an English Professor or Master should sort through for consensus? Would you be so kind as to clarify these problematic areas for us to grasp, or get a handle on these concepts in total? Am including 4 dictionary descriptions to be of some assist for this perplexing anomaly status.                        -Morbius

Construct  v build or put together

Construction

n 1. constructing

   2. thing constructed

   3. interpretation

   4. grammer -way in which words are arranged in a sentence, clause, or phrase.

Construe

1. interpret

2. analyse grammatically

Constructive adj. ( of advise, criticism, etc.)) useful and helpful

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Yes Levelwind, I think we see there only the tip of the iceberg.

Interesting point examined more closely. it's actually much more to see in the original picture if you look closely.

 TheWatcher, I think I am not obliged to answer some things that I have no interest to answering.

TheWatcher, I'm not trying to be this or that I'm this or that. Do it for me and you ,, relax, breathe deeply.

Morbius, has been accused of saying more than he can prove, but who has not been in such circumstances. But to show that morbius knows more than, various of pretending to know better, do I toggle an item to support him.

For further information on the project, noting that the immediate background to the forground ("rock") is treated the same way as the foreground
 so TheWatcher example shows, fail as a practical example.
TheWatcher, no matter what you fight for the interests of NASA, both here and on J.P. Skippers guestbook.

We succeed, our knowledge grows, we approach the final goal. See what NASA is doing now: look up an old sources in the current challenging research project. I call this strengthening the foundation of delusion.